I see something that has not changed in admin order details page. The customers billing and shipping address.
It always looks like this which makes no since:
Customer Customer
44 Main street
Boston, Massachusetts 02134
United States
Company:
Testing One Two
It should look like this which is easier to read:
Testing One Two
Customer Customer
44 Main street
Boston, MA 02134 USA
Since it doesn't make sense, let me help you make sense of it. :-P
The "Company" field is not part of the default installation for billing and shipping. It has obviously been added as an extra field whereas any extra fields get added last. Code modifications will need to be made to adjust it how you would like.
"Save and Close" button disapear, when create product
Plus to that. I would line this back espcially in banners area. Clicks now are much higher when want to get back in list.
Also in the Deign > template code editor when I have a long tree of addons on the left, and the code of the file is only 2 lines, thne i have to scroll up to see the code, and scroll down to see the file ore select anotehr one in the same folder, and then up agaion to see the code. Those 2 window should have seperate scrolls (indipendant from each other) its not ery handy when work with code.
1) Ability to change color to match front-end (needed for multivendor branding)
2) Add logo for vendor admin panels (good branding practice)
3) Add text to "+", "Gear", "->", "V" signs that are used to add element, see more options, go back, more options..it will be an enhancement form UI perspective. Save button has text but all other buttons have signs, making them all similar will improve usability.
It took me a while to get used to "+" and "Gear" signs, they are NOT attention-getter as they should.
1) Your developer can use css to change colors for you.
2) Addons available for this in the marketplace
3) Are you talking tool-tips? That would be a core change that you should route through helpdesk. If you're talking changing from "+" to "Add" and gear menu icon to "Menu", too me, that would be a step backward. Currently closely matches an Android Phone UI.