Cs Cart Speed Issue

cscart development a lot things…



i installed 4.3.1 ----------yes ofcouse it faster then older , but still need fix (WAITING (TTFB))



it show to me 230ms 480ms <----------this is slow then other middle size shopping mall.



normally has to show 19ms
max 88ms





how demo site can be 200~~~ ms it;'s too late.



you guys check your country little famous site server response time…

We are running our website in Cs-Cart Multi-Vendor version 4.1.4.

We have almost 800 vendors till now. Our main issue is that on assigning same product to each vendor, a new product is saving in the database. Due to this more than 3 lakhs products added in my database. Now my front site and admin panel both are running very slow after this.

Cs-Cart is also telling that they can't handle such heavy database. Should we talk to server guys regarding the same or any other idea will be highly appreciable.

Can anyone suggest how to handle this?

Your earlier response will be highly appreciable.

Dear CNCINC, I am also concerned with the initial load time & TTFB. Amazon.com does have TTFB in the ranges you described (around 50 ms). However, I checked a wide range of popular and large ecommerce sites in India atleast (flipkart.com, infibeam.com and others) and TTFB is around 300 ms.

I guess there's no tweak possible to this, right? It's a function of the core code execution of cs-cart, and can't be tweaked? Can CDNs help here?

Dear Suman : I think there's a fair bit of work that hosting companies / optimization experts can do to resolve this. E.g. Wiredtree gives you options to have your database sitting on a separate SSD drive.

You of course will have to spend a decent amount in optimizations, and on hosting expenses.

Shopclues.com has 35 million products and 0.3 million merchants, and it's a heavily modified cs-cart

PM me your site address, and I will take a look

Cheers

We are running our website in Cs-Cart Multi-Vendor version 4.1.4.

We have almost 800 vendors till now. Our main issue is that on assigning same product to each vendor, a new product is saving in the database. Due to this more than 3 lakhs products added in my database. Now my front site and admin panel both are running very slow after this.

Cs-Cart is also telling that they can't handle such heavy database. Should we talk to server guys regarding the same or any other idea will be highly appreciable.

Can anyone suggest how to handle this?

Your earlier response will be highly appreciable.

Hello,

We have read your message and we are happy and ready to help you. We developed more than 5+ CS-Cart MV websites and those websites are running minimum 500+ suppliers.

Would be a great if you can share your website URL. Feel free to reach Us at business@synicsys.com or www.synicsys.com

Thank you.

We are running our website in Cs-Cart Multi-Vendor version 4.1.4.

We have almost 800 vendors till now. Our main issue is that on assigning same product to each vendor, a new product is saving in the database. Due to this more than 3 lakhs products added in my database. Now my front site and admin panel both are running very slow after this.

Cs-Cart is also telling that they can't handle such heavy database. Should we talk to server guys regarding the same or any other idea will be highly appreciable.

Can anyone suggest how to handle this?

Your earlier response will be highly appreciable.

Hi suman_wisitech,

We are reviewing the idea of vendor products without duplicates. You are welcome to share your thoughts on this in this thread: http://forum.cs-cart.com/topic/43548-central-product-database-no-duplicates-from-uservoice/

Hi suman_wisitech,

We are reviewing the idea of vendor products without duplicates. You are welcome to share your thoughts on this in this thread: http://forum.cs-cart.com/topic/43548-central-product-database-no-duplicates-from-uservoice/

hello imac,

just a question about the speed of some additional block on product pages.

In current configuration the speed of cs cart is very ok. But most websites and our needs is to have some other blocks on product pages. Let's say some block with scroller and filled with the similar filter, recently viewed products and at least 1 attached product tab. When adding some of above named blocks the speed is downgraded. So my question is are the other blocks also optimal coded. Can You please test such situation.

Thank you in advance.

Hi,

Concerning speed issues in CS-Cart, one of the best and less costly solutions is "cache everything".

There are different levels/types of caching:

Server-side:

File cache,

Database: Mysql, Sqlite

In-Memory cache: APC

Cache server: Memcache, Redis, Varnish

Client-side:

Browser cache,

Static files concatenation and minification

Use of publicly hosted famous librairies

...

I am currently working on a powerful CS-Cart optimizer module, that will help you reach up to 20 times faster experience.

It is in beta tests now and will be release to public soon.

If you are interested in the module, drop me a line on twitter @odience_net

Read this for more "technical" info: http://www.gibni.com/optimize-cs-cart-store

Hi Amir,

I want to say this on behalf of entire cs-cart community: We are all very interested in optimization that will help us reach up-to 20 times faster experience.

I hope I will get some +1 votes here.

Cheers,

X

Hi Amir,

I want to say this on behalf of entire cs-cart community: We are all very interested in optimization that will help us reach up-to 20 times faster experience.

I hope I will get some +1 votes here.

Cheers,

X

4.3.6 on PHP7 will hole 2 times more rps, than 4.3.5 on PHP5.6

Also we are working on Varnish Full-Page cache: http://forum.cs-cart.com/topic/22522-varnish-cache-for-cs-cart/?view=findpost&p=239078

So stay tuned:)

hello imac,

just a question about the speed of some additional block on product pages.

In current configuration the speed of cs cart is very ok. But most websites and our needs is to have some other blocks on product pages. Let's say some block with scroller and filled with the similar filter, recently viewed products and at least 1 attached product tab. When adding some of above named blocks the speed is downgraded. So my question is are the other blocks also optimal coded. Can You please test such situation.

Thank you in advance.

It's simple if we can cache a block we cache it, If can not than we don't.

Blocks like recently viewed can not be cached, and thus can affect the performanceб yet the similar items block can be cached.

So it's depend on wether this block can be showed to another store visitor in the exact same state.

It’s logical about recently viewed. Let’s say similiar filter block, on sale product block, newest products and wuch types of block if can be cached it would be nice.


I belive most of us don’t use only the presented simple product page.


Best wishes anyway.

Dzemal

This was only idea. If such improvement can be added.


Regards

Just thought I kick this thread as I had some severe issues with Redis. According to the CS Cart architects it was badly configured on my server.

What I forgot to ask is how can you check if it is wrongly configured. We were constantly logged out from the store admin panel. When we redis was deactivated within the config.local.php file all was well again.

Hi

Just updating this thread if the mods do not mind.

I recently did some PageSpeed test with Google PageSpeed Tools - Insights

One very urgent thing I found is this:

Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

[attachment=11658:page-speed.jpg]

How do I accomplish this ??

page-speed.jpg

Stop using Cloudfront.?

Edit: Nope, it does it without using Cloundfront. Funny thing is Pagespeed states "Should fix" on Mobile but just "Consider fixing" on desktop on my test.

Hi

Just updating this thread if the mods do not mind.

I recently did some PageSpeed test with Google PageSpeed Tools - Insights

One very urgent thing I found is this:

Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

attachicon.gifpage-speed.jpg

How do I accomplish this ??

Unfortunately Google page speed consider CSS as blocking content however if you move css to the bottom you will get two problems:

1) the site first will be loaded without styles and after it will jump to the normal design

2) browser have to render site view twice, first without styles, second with styles - so it can take longer in total.

So we decided to ignore this recomendation.

Imac

Thanks for the elaborate feedback. I will then ignore this "recommendation" by the company that claims to do no evil, Ahum.. right.